A disappointed Athenian aristocrat, a master sentenced to death, a failed trip to Sicily... and in the end, a school and a theory that still shape our way of thinking. Here is Plato, explained simply.
A disappointed Athenian aristocrat, a master sentenced to death, a failed trip to Sicily... and in the end, a school and a theory that still shape our way of thinking. Here is Plato, explained simply.
His name is mentioned everywhere, often without much knowledge of what he actually wrote. Plato (427-347 BC) is one of the few thinkers whose work has survived almost intact, and whose questions have not aged: what is justice? what is knowledge? what would a well-governed city look like?
First, let's recall a point of vocabulary: the word philosophy means in Greek love of wisdom. It is therefore not originally a school subject, but a way of living and seeking. Plato is one of its great organizers: he inherits from Socrates, his master, and passes it on to his own student, Aristotle, who will eventually contradict him.
Between the two, there is a man who traveled, failed in politics, founded a school in 387 BC, and built an entire system of thought around an intuition: what our eyes see is not what is most real. It is this intuition, called theory of ideas, that we will unfold here step by step.
Plato was born into a family of the Athenian aristocracy. This detail matters: he grew up in an environment accustomed to power, public debates, and high culture, at a time when that world was cracking.
His youth was indeed marked by revolution and the tyranny of the Thirty, an episode that hastened the disintegration of Athenian democracy. Witnessing a regime unravel before his eyes, seeing violence replace deliberation, leaves lasting scars on a gifted young man. A significant part of his political work can be understood as a response to this disorder.
Intellectually, he was initially influenced by two main sources: the sophists, those teachers of rhetoric who were thriving in Athens at the time, and Cratylus, a disciple of Heraclitus. Now, Heraclitus, nicknamed the obscure, had built a philosophy of becoming and instability, summarized by his famous saying: you cannot step into the same river twice. Keep this idea in mind, for Plato would spend his life searching, behind this constant flux, for something that does not change.
In this damaged Athens, only one man seems to Plato to honestly attempt to purify politics: Socrates (470-399 BC). The son of a sculptor and a midwife, indifferent to his appearance and his legendary ugliness, Socrates wrote nothing. He speaks, he questions, he disturbs.
His method is very concrete. In the face of the sophists, he employs irony: he feigns ignorance to help them discover their own. With his disciples, he practices maieutics, literally the delivery of minds, in memory of his mother's profession: instead of providing ready-made knowledge, he leads his students to find the truth for themselves. He also proceeds by induction, examining several particular cases to identify what is just, and thus what justice is.
His motto, inscribed on the fronton of the temple of Delphi, consists of three words: Know thyself. His tool is dialectics, dialogue conducted not to shine but to educate citizens and warn them against smooth talkers.
In 399 BC, Socrates is accused by the democratic party of wanting to introduce new gods and corrupting the youth. He is sentenced to drink hemlock. For Plato, the shock is foundational: the city has just killed the most just man it had.
Plato was a great traveler, and his journeys were not for tourism: each stop brought him a piece of his future system.
In Cyrene, he became familiar with mathematics. There, he discovered a type of truth that depends neither on opinion, nor on witness, nor on time.In Egypt and Italy, he was introduced to Pythagoreanism. Pythagoras and his disciples were the first to formulate the doctrine of the immortality of the soul, palingenesis: the soul could pass from one body to another and escape death by reintegrating into that of a newborn. This doctrine will find a direct echo in the dialogue titled Phaedo.
Southern Italy offered him something else. It was in Elea that the Eleatics, around Parmenides and Zeno, asserted against Heraclitus the identity and eternity of being: there cannot be a new being, said Parmenides, because if it comes from the old being, it was already there.
It is directly from this school that the theory of ideas will emerge. In other words, Plato retrieves on one side the observation that everything changes (Heraclitus), and on the other the requirement of a being that does not change (Parmenides), and he will attempt to accommodate both within the same structure.
In Sicily, Plato does not come merely to discuss. He attempts a large-scale political experiment: to make Dionysius I, the master of Syracuse, a philosopher king.
The idea is perfectly consistent with everything that has come before. If the evil of the cities arises from the fact that power is exercised by people who do not know what is just, then in theory, it would be enough to educate the one who governs. An educated tyrant in philosophy would become a good ruler.
The endeavor fails. Plato returns from Italy without having converted Dionysius I, and this failure weighs heavily: it shows that one cannot reform a man of power through a simple conversation. The conclusion he draws is not to abandon politics, but to approach it differently, upstream. Since one cannot transform an already established tyrant, it is necessary to patiently educate those who will govern tomorrow. This is precisely the program of the school he is going to create.
In 387 BC, back in Athens, Plato founded his school at the gymnasium of the Academy. Deeply affected by the tyranny of the Thirty, he now asserts a simple conviction: politics must be based on philosophy, not the other way around.
A gymnasium in ancient Greece is not a sports hall in the modern sense: it is a public place for walking, exercising, and discussing. Teaching takes place while walking, talking, and debating, far removed from the image of a silent amphitheater.
This act of founding may be the most fruitful of his entire life. Plato does not merely write: he institutionalizes research, creating a place that survives its founder. He will teach there until his death in 347 BC.
Where does the word Academy come from, which we use today for scholarly institutions, film awards, or rectorships? From a place, quite simply.
Plato's school takes its name from a promenade in Athens that was bequeathed to the city by Academus, a contemporary of Theseus. The philosopher did not invent the term: he settled in a place that already bore that name, and usage took care of the rest.
Nota Bene: this little story of toponymy has enormous consequences. Plato's Academy is the ancestor of modern Academies. It served as a model for Charlemagne's Palatine School, and later for the French Academy founded in the 17th century by Richelieu. When you hear about academicians and their dome, you are hearing, from a great distance, the echo of an Athenian promenade.
One readily imagines the Academy as a club for abstract discussion. This is false: four disciplines are taught there, and their assembly is revealing.
Philosophy, which provides the general framework and method.Mathematics, brought from Cyrene and nourished by Pythagoreanism, which trains the mind to handle perfectly stable objects: a triangle does not age, a ratio of numbers does not degrade.Politics, since the stated goal is indeed to train those who will have to make decisions for the city.Medicine, which anchors reflection in the body, health, and balance.
This program says everything about the Platonic project: philosophy is not a specialty alongside the others; it is what connects and organizes knowledge. One does not learn mathematics to count, but to practice thinking about realities that the senses do not provide. It is a preparatory gymnastics, in the literal sense, before accessing ultimate questions.
The entire system of Plato is based on the theory of ideas. Be careful with the word: an idea, here, is not a thought that crosses your mind; it is not something subjective. It is quite the opposite.
An Idea, in Plato's view, is an intelligible form, the model of all things of the same kind. It is a reality that we do not perceive and yet is more real than sensible beings. It underpins the phenomenon and gives it meaning. Take beauty: the objects you find beautiful change, go out of fashion, fade, but what makes them beautiful, the idea of Beauty, does not move.
Ideas are therefore eternal types. They pertain to what Plato calls essence: a reality that remains identical to itself and ignores all becoming, the true being. The universal essences that the mind grasps cannot be found lodged in sensible objects, since those change all the time.
This is how Plato resolves the old dispute between Heraclitus and Parmenides: yes, the world we see flows continuously, but there exists another plane, invisible, where permanence, truth, and justice reign.
Plato's philosophy is dualistic: it rests on two worlds. On one side is the world of ideas, and on the other is the world of sensible appearances, the latter being only the imperfect reflection of the former. Life on earth is described as a state of impurity, and forms can only be known through thought, never through the senses.
Nota Bene: in this vocabulary, sensible means perceived by the five senses, and intelligible means graspable by the intellect alone. Two words to remember, they appear everywhere in the history of philosophy. Let us add opinion (in Greek doxa): it is the inferior knowledge, that which pertains to sensible objects, a bastard mixture of truth and ignorance.
To move from one to the other, Plato describes a precise itinerary, the dialectical ascent, in two main stages:
Freeing oneself from established opinions, and thus better knowing the world of sensible appearances for what it is.Accessing through discursive thought the knowledge of increasingly real things, which is reasoned knowledge, and then rising to illumination by contemplating the idea of the Good, which is true intelligence.
This progression assumes a theory of the soul: the soul would have sinned in a previous life and, punished, would have been cast into a body. United to it, it can nevertheless survive it, for it is eternal. Hence the famous thesis of reminiscence: at the time of incarnation, the soul has forgotten the Ideas it once knew, so that all knowledge is actually a recollection. To learn is to remember. Plato presents this in the Meno and in the Phaedo.
From this architecture arose the most famous image of Western thought, the myth of the cave, to which centuries later Francis Bacon will refer again when speaking of the prejudices of the cave, those that cause each person to judge according to what they are, according to their education and according to their nature.
To understand the stakes, one must see against whom Plato is writing. In the middle of the 5th century BC, Athens is the political and intellectual center of Greece, and it is the sophists who set the intellectual law there. The term refers to skilled men, often of modest means, who make a living from their teaching, which traditionalists harshly criticize.
Their credo: access to power comes through perfect mastery of language and argumentation. They do not transmit knowledge but rather a political education for the citizen and an almost magical use of speech. Protagoras thus develops the theory of the opposing discourse: for every issue, there are two discourses that confront each other, and one can always combine the facts and ideas of others to arrive at the opposite conclusion. Gorgias, who introduces rhetoric to Athens, demonstrates in his Encomium of Helen the power of speech: if Paris convinced Helen, it was through words, and words alone would be responsible for our actions.
The problem is glaring: if anything can be supported and its opposite, morality and truth become matters of rhetorical talent. The most gifted is right.
In response to this relativistic power, Socrates' most famous student opposes the idea of the Good: the divine, the supreme principle, superior to existence and essence itself. This is not just an opinion among others, but the end of dialectical ascent, which illuminates everything else. Against the art of winning a debate, Plato posits a fixed point.
In Plato's view, philosophy is never a parlor exercise. Through true philosophy, he forges a means to combat the **gaps and weaknesses of society** in his time. The term remedy is not exaggerated: it is about healing a sick city.
His notion of **justice** illustrates this well, as it operates on two levels simultaneously. In the human soul, justice refers to the order that keeps each of our inner forces in its place and function. In the state, it signifies that each class fulfills its task and executes its own function. Thus, the individual and the city obey the same principle of balance, and one does not go without the other.
This is the great project of **The Republic**, which seeks ways to achieve the ideal city and, for that purpose, investigates morality, politics, society, and justice. In the **Gorgias**, the discussion becomes even more intense: after attempting to define rhetoric, the dialogue allows Callicles to present his own definition of justice.
What you can take away, very concretely: for Plato, one does not repair a society by changing the laws before changing the souls. Education is the number one political lever.
The Sicilian failure did not extinguish Plato's political ambition; it shifted it. Marked by the tyranny of the Thirty, he asserts the necessity of a politics based on philosophy and creates the Academy to make it possible.
Several of his dialogues serve as laboratories of government. The Statesman is dedicated to the ideal politician, to what one who leads should be. The Laws, the most extensive of all his dialogues, takes place in Crete: a Spartan, a Cretan, and an Athenian make their way to the sanctuary of Zeus on Mount Ida via the road from Knossos. These three old men dedicate their morning to discussing what legislation should be, and then, during the hot hours, to the organization of the city.
The detail of the setting is not trivial. Plato shows men who walk, who take their time, who resume after the siesta: good law is not improvised in the urgency of a heated assembly. It requires slowness, discussion, and a clear idea of the Good.
If you were to remember only one thing from his politics, it would be this: power without knowledge is a danger, and knowledge without concern for the city is an escape.
Plato's work presents itself in a unique form: dialogues, in which Socrates is almost always the main character. This choice is a method, not a literary whim. The dialogue is a way of philosophizing through debate and discussion, where Socrates appears as the one who helps his interlocutor discover their own truth through a shared journey.
A practical consequence for today's reader: one does not read Plato as a treatise. One follows a conversation, with its false leads, objections, and silences. Here are some entry points and their subjects:
Minor Hippias: Socrates, facing the sophists, pretends to want to be instructed by them but supports a thesis that is indeed his own: virtue is knowledge.The Apology: Plato reconstructs the main lines of Socrates' defense before his judges.Lysis: a dialogue centered on friendship.Gorgias: defining and explaining rhetoric, in front of Gorgias and Polus.The Symposium: seven speakers take turns praising love as a method of knowledge.Phaedo: the becoming and immortality of the soul.Phaedrus: speech, already explored in Cratylus, and the praise of Beauty.The Republic: the ideal city, morality, politics, justice.Timaeus and Critias: the search for the origin of the world.Theaetetus: an attempt to define science.The Statesman and The Laws: the ideal ruler, then legislation and the organization of the city.
A reading tip: start with a short and concrete dialogue, Lysis on friendship or The Apology, before tackling The Republic.
The first heir of Plato is also his first opponent. Aristotle (384-322 BC), coming from Stagira in Macedonia, is initially his student in Athens. He does not accept the theory of ideas and breaks with Platonism, before founding his own school, the Lyceum, where he teaches while walking, hence the nickname Peripatetics given to his disciples. The formula that best summarizes their divorce remains: while Plato turns his eyes to the sky, the sky of ideas, Aristotle looks at the earth and rehabilitates the experience of the sensible.
But Plato's influence spans the centuries. In the 3rd century AD, Plotinus founded Neoplatonism, where one recognizes in his One the God of Plato. In the West, Saint Augustine, influenced by him, develops a true Christian Platonism. Much later, Saint Thomas Aquinas will take the opposite stance by demonstrating that sensible knowledge remains the starting point of all knowledge, and Hegel will find Plato again by making dialectics the very movement of philosophy.
The legacy is also institutional, and perhaps the most visible: the Academy of the Athenian gymnasium is the ancestor of all our academies, from Charlemagne's Palatine School to the French Academy desired by Richelieu in the 17th century.
What to make of all this? Remember three simple things and you will have the essence: Plato distinguishes two worlds, one that our senses perceive and the other that only thought can reach, he places the idea of the Good at the top against those who make truth a matter of eloquence, and he believes that no city thrives if those who govern it have not first worked on themselves. Then open a dialogue, any dialogue: you will see that people still discuss, out loud, the questions you are asking.
Author Luc on 16 June 2022
Art and Culture : Comic book
Author Audrey on 21 April 2022
Art and Culture : Museums